Section B
Matrix of Teacher Self-Assessment/Survey Instruments
A second subgroup identified existing instruments and developed a set of key components that should be considered when selecting an assessment instrument. These components are included in the table below. The purposes of developing this matrix was to establish a set of criteria on which a state or district might base a decision to select one of these or other instruments, as well as to provide an example of a comparison of these instruments to one another across the set of criteria the group developed.
The group recorded as much information as was available to them at the time of the work group sessions on the set of instruments selected. Those selected were included because at least one member of the subgroup had used or had knowledge of, the instrument. There was no intent to exclude other existing instruments nor to provide an endorsement of those selected by the group. After the work group session, SETDA staff contacted state representatives to add information regarding the Idaho Performance, Idaho Portfolio, and TAGLIT instruments.
A printer friendly version of the table is available.
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Chapter Summary Assessment Strategies and Examples Instruments Alternative Assessments Guidelines Statewide Implementation Guidelines Detailed Guidelines |
||
|
|
 |