|
|
Articles Framing the SBR Debate -
Berliner, D. C. (2002). Educational Research: The Hardest Science of All. [Electronic version]. Educational Researcher, 31(8),18-20. -
Eisenhart, M., & Towne, L. (2003). Contestation and change in national policy on "scientifically based" education research. [Electronic version]. Educational Researcher, 32(7), 31-38 -
Erickson, F., & Gutierrez, K. (2002). Culture, rigor, and science in educational research. [Electronic version]. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 21-24. -
Feuer, M. J., Towne, L., & Shavelson, R. J. (2002). Reply. [Electronic version]. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 28-29. -
Feuer, M. J., Towne, L., & Shavelson, R. J. (2002). Scientific culture and educational research. [Electronic version]. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 4-14. -
Maxwell, J. (2004). Causal explanation, qualitative research, and scientific inquiry in education. [Electronic version]. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 3-11. -
St. Pierre, E. A. (2002). "Science" rejects postmodernism. [Electronic version]. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 25-27. Bibliography -
Campbell, D.T. & Stanley, J.C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally College Pub. Co. -
Chelimsky, E and Shadish W.R (eds) (1997) Evaluation for the 21st century : A handbook. Sage Publications. -
-
-
-
Haertel, G. D., & Means, B. (2003). Evaluating educational technology: Effective research designs for improving learning. New York: Teachers College Press. -
-
Means, B., & Haertel, G. D. (2004). Using technology evaluation to enhance student learning. New York: Teachers College Press. -
-
-
-
Shadish, W.R., Cook, T.D., & Campbell, D.T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for general causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. -
Educational Technology Assessment Instruments Legislation Strategic Plans Tools Websites
|
|
|